První schůzka.

První schůzka.

Lubomír Tomik

a schůzka na ostrově jabloní,
každé setkání s TEBOU bylo
každé jedinečné,
každý pohled Tě vždy objevoval.

navždy budeš dívka černě se třpytící,
navždy s růží kyticí,
navždy na mávnutí rukou čekají,
 hladoví lučištníci.

JSI nádherná,
svedla by jsi kaina i ábela,

Nikdy už nepůjdu na film z něhož nemůžu odejít,
stále ale nakukuješ zpod jmelí,
zpod jmelí, Tvá tvář,
stále jasněji.

The first meeting.

Lubomír Tomik

and a gathering on the island of apple trees,
every meeting with YOU was
each unique
every sight has always discovered You.
you will forever be a girl of black glitter,
forever with a rose bouquet,
waiting forever to wave,
hungry archers.

YOURE beautiful,
YOU would seduce cain and abel,

i will never go to a movie i can't leave again,
but you still peek from under the mistletoe,
under the mistletoe, YOUR face,
increasingly clear.

Pod arménským srpkem Měsíce.

Pod Arménským srpkem Měsíce.

Lubomír Tomik

Pod arménským svitem Měsíce
plulo vydařenou taškařicí království ledových dcer Albionu,
přepásáno miliony Excaliburů u pasů a Morgana La Fay 
                                         k útoku,
kněz se žehnal a ony,
lahodná těla ve světle modrých bavlněných blůzkách,
 v bílých baletních sukních,
ve střevíčcích touhy se proplétaly a míhaly kolem sebe,
vlající bavlna,
kameny Stonehenge.

Stála jsi opodál a koukala na ně,
smutné oči bažící po zklamání,
má touha po Tobě vystřelila až do kráteru Ticho,
Verneův projektil do srdce,
sesunutý okraj Tycha.

Under the Armenian Crescent Moon.

Lubomír Tomik

Under the Armenian moonlight
sailed the successful bagging kingdom of the ice daughters of Albion,
millions of Excaliburs were strapped to their passports, and
 Morgana La Fay ordered
to attack,
the priest blessed himself, 
and they,
delicious bodies in light blue cotton blouses,
in white ballet skirts,
in the shoes of desire intertwined, the flickering cotton in between
Stonehenge stones.

You stood nearby and looked and they,
sad eyes longing for disappointment,
my desire for you has shot up to the crater of Silence,
Verne's projectile into the heart,
Tych's collapsed edge.

When did we become fully human? What fossils and DNA tell us about the evolution of modern intelligence

by Nick Longrich, The Conversation

When did something like us first appear on the planet? It turns out there’s remarkably little agreement on this question. Fossils and DNA suggest people looking like us, anatomically modern Homo sapiens, evolved around 300,000 years ago. Surprisingly, archeology—tools, artifacts, cave art—suggest that complex technology and cultures, „behavioral modernity,“ evolved more recently: 50,000-65,000 years ago.

Some scientists interpret this as suggesting the earliest Homo sapiens weren’t entirely modern. Yet the different data tracks different things. Skulls and genes tell us about brains, artifacts about culture. Our brains probably became modern before our cultures.

The „great leap“

For 200,000-300,000 years after Homo sapiens first appeared, tools and artifacts remained surprisingly simple, little better than Neanderthal technology, and simpler than those of modern hunter-gatherers such as certain indigenous Americans. Starting about 65,000 to 50,000 years ago, more advanced technology started appearing: complex projectile weapons such as bows and spear-throwersfishhooksceramicssewing needles.

People made representational art – cave paintings of horsesivory goddesseslion-headed idols, showing artistic flair and imagination. A bird-bone flute hints at music. Meanwhile, arrival of humans in Australia 65,000 years ago shows we’d mastered seafaring.

This sudden flourishing of technology is called the „great leap forward„, supposedly reflecting the evolution of a fully modern human brain. But fossils and DNA suggest that human intelligence became modern far earlier.

Anatomical modernity

Bones of primitive Homo sapiens first appear 300,000 years ago in Africa, with brains as large or larger than ours. They’re followed by anatomically modern Homo sapiens at least 200,000 years ago, and brain shape became essentially modern by at least 100,000 years ago. At this point, humans had braincases similar in size and shape to ours.

Assuming the brain was as modern as the box that held it, our African ancestors theoretically could have discovered relativity, built space telescopes, written novels and love songs. Their bones say they were just as human as we are.

Because the fossil record is so patchy, fossils provide only minimum dates. Human DNA suggests even earlier origins for modernity. Comparing genetic differences between DNA in modern people and ancient Africans, it’s estimated that our ancestors lived 260,000 to 350,000 years ago. All living humans descend from those people, suggesting that we inherited the fundamental commonalities of our species, our humanity, from them.

All their descendants—Bantu, Berber, Aztec, Aboriginal, Tamil, San, Han, Maori, Inuit, Irish—share certain peculiar behaviors absent in other great apes. All human cultures form long-term pair bonds between men and women to care for children. We sing and dance. We make art. We preen our hair, adorn our bodies with ornaments, tattoos and makeup.

We craft shelters. We wield fire and complex tools. We form large, multigenerational social groups with dozens to thousands of people. We cooperate to wage war and help each other. We teach, tell stories, trade. We have morals, laws. We contemplate the stars, our place in the cosmos, life’s meaning, what follows death.

When did we become fully human? What fossils and DNA tell us about the evolution of modern intelligence
Key physical and cultural milestones in modern human evolution, including genetic divergence of ethnic groups. Credit: Nick Longrich, Author provided

The details of our tools, fashions, families, morals and mythologies vary from tribe to tribe and culture to culture, but all living humans show these behaviors. That suggests these behaviors—or at least, the capacity for them—are innate. These shared behaviors unite all people. They’re the human condition, what it means to be human, and they result from shared ancestry.

We inherited our humanity from peoples in southern Africa 300,000 years ago. The alternative—that everyone, everywhere coincidentally became fully human in the same way at the same time, starting 65,000 years ago—isn’t impossible, but a single origin is more likely.

The network effect

Archeology and biology may seem to disagree, but they actually tell different parts of the human story. Bones and DNA tell us about brain evolution, our hardware. Tools reflect brainpower, but also culture, our hardware and software.

Just as you can upgrade your old computer’s operating system, culture can evolve even if intelligence doesn’t. Humans in ancient times lacked smartphones and spaceflight, but we know from studying philosophers such as Buddha and Aristotle that they were just as clever. Our brains didn’t change, our culture did.

That creates a puzzle. If Pleistocene hunter-gatherers were as smart as us, why did culture remain so primitive for so long? Why did we need hundreds of millennia to invent bows, sewing needles, boats? And what changed? Probably several things.

First, we journeyed out of Africa, occupying more of the planet. There were then simply more humans to invent, increasing the odds of a prehistoric Steve Jobs or Leonardo da Vinci. We also faced new environments in the Middle East, the Arctic, India, Indonesia, with unique climates, foods and dangers, including other human species. Survival demanded innovation.

Many of these new lands were far more habitable than the Kalahari or the Congo. Climates were milder, but Homo sapiens also left behind African diseases and parasites. That let tribes grow larger, and larger tribes meant more heads to innovate and remember ideas, more manpower, and better ability to specialize. Population drove innovation.

This triggered feedback cycles. As new technologies appeared and spread—better weapons, clothing, shelters—human numbers could increase further, accelerating cultural evolution again.

Numbers drove culture, culture increased numbers, accelerating cultural evolution, on and on, ultimately pushing human populations to outstrip their ecosystems, devastating the megafauna and forcing the evolution of farming. Finally, agriculture caused an explosive population increase, culminating in civilisations of millions of people. Now, cultural evolution kicked into hyperdrive.

Artifacts reflect culture, and cultural complexity is an emergent property. That is, it’s not just individual-level intelligence that makes cultures sophisticated, but interactions between individuals in groups, and between groups. Like networking millions of processors to make a supercomputer, we increased cultural complexity by increasing the number of people and the links between them.

So our societies and world evolved rapidly in the past 300,000 years, while our brains evolved slowly. We expanded our numbers to almost 8 billion, spread across the globe, reshaped the planet. We did it not by adapting our brains but by changing our cultures. And much of the difference between our ancient, simple hunter-gatherer societies and modern societies just reflects the fact that there are lots more of us and more connections between us.